Speciesism has 54 ratings and 4 reviews. Wendy said: This is a take-no- prisoners look at human treatment of nonhumans and how such behavior is enabled th. Joan Dunayer is a writer, editor, and animal rights advocate. She is the author of two books, Animal Equality () and Speciesism (). Dunayer graduated. Joan Dunayer is an American writer, editor, and animal rights advocate. “Sexist Words, Speciesist Roots”, in Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical.
|Published (Last):||27 November 2008|
|PDF File Size:||14.79 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.91 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Sign in Create an account. In both examples above, the prohibitions recognize interests that would be recognized were the animals not property at all. Arnela rated it it was amazing Jun 30, On the speciseism, the rights advocate is left with a most important and time-consuming project: This would still constitute wrongful exploitation, and Francione explicitly states this.
Dunayer defends her stances well, although the book felt very much like a college textbook. Eric rated it liked it Jul 26, Ivan rated it it was amazing Jun 27, Radically egalitarian, Speciesism envisions nonspeciesist thought, law, and action.
Luthien Michaelis rated it liked it Mar 16, Jonathan rated it it was ok May 13, Francione, Introduction to Animal Rights: This inevitably requires the acceptance of reformist measures. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. What is essential in seeking any incremental change is that rights advocates recognize that their efforts must be accompanied by a continuing and unrelenting political demand for the complete eradication of the property status of animals.
Joan Dunayer – Wikipedia
Speciesism by Joan Dunayer. Many organizations that consider themselves animal rights advocates engage in old-speciesist campaigns, which reinforce the property status of nonhumans rather than promoting their emancipation. As previously discussed, if a prohibition e. Dunayer shows that “animal laws” such as the Humane Slaughter Act afford nonhumans no meaningful protection.
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Steve rated it really liked it Dec 11, Again, although the hens would still be wrongfully exploited as property in this way, their interest in liberty of movement would be fully respected, and this would constitute an incremental step towards respecting all of their interests.
To understand why Francione draws these conclusions, it is necessary to examine his analysis. This was a very good defense for the case of animal rights and nonhumans across the globe. Dinayer Gold – – J. There are a couple things I take issue with in this book; she makes disparaging comments about Christianity, and while I’m not Christian, I think this will put out a bunch of people who could potentially become allies for nonhumans.
Hunters kill approximately million animals in the United States annually. Vegans and animal advocates would also benefit from reading this book if for nothing less than to tweak their arguments that often entail following someone finding out you are such a person.
Joan Dunayer – Wikiquote
Dunayer’s objections to Francione’s highly qualified suggestion that a prohibition against confining hens to battery cages could be consistent with animal rights theory are specious. If I were in such an extreme emergency situation and decided to kill another sentient being, human or non-human, in order to save myself, I dunayfr be intensely aware at the time that what I was doing was fundamentally immoral, and that it would be entirely justified if I were convicted of murder afterwards.
Francione, Animals, Property and the Law The Jooan of Speciesism. You can help Wikiquote by expanding it.
Since the artificial genetic selection that they have been subject to cannot be undone, the rights of modern chickens can never be fully respected. But in the absence of such support for alternative forms of exploitation. There apeciesism a profound disparity between what we [the public] say we believe about animals, and how we actually treat them.
Her articles and essays have appeared in magazines, journals, college textbooks, and speciesissm. What Everyone Needs to Know.
Using one standard for foreign species and a different standard for local species is arbitrary and speciesist. These incremental measures may be seen, however, as recognizing pieces of the basic right not to be regarded as property.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Mark Rowlands – – Palgrave-Macmillan.