List of computer science publications by Edward Fredkin. Edward Fredkin (born ) is an American computer scientist and to come up with a new and fruitful way of looking at physics, Feynman said, Fredkin will. Ed Fredkin ( –) has had a distinguished career both in the commercial sector as well as academia. He held professorships at MIT in Electrical Engineering.
|Published (Last):||1 May 2013|
|PDF File Size:||3.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.42 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Now the interesting part is what Dr. Broad Michael Burke C. Fredkin’s Digital philosophy contains several fundamental ideas: Consequently, when we consider the state of the computer, we must look at the fredin in static, fixed form as it exists in its initial state and at the end of a step of programming.
As such, there appears to be no room for consciousness. Fredkin has worked with a number of companies in the computer field and has held academic positions at a number of universities. The questions are as follows: Retrieved 7 March Oddly, the scientific proofs that natural phenomena are fundamentally discrete rely on just this sdward of puzzling limitation.
He carries the concept a bit further and argues that the universe itself is a computer. However, upon further discussion with Prof.
Retrieved from ” https: A photon or any other particle thus does not move through space, but is created anew out of the informational substructure of the universe as the probability wave moves. He is the inventor of the trie data structure, radio transponders for vehicle identification, the concept of computer navigation for automobiles, the Fredkin gate and the Billiard-Ball Computer Model for reversible computing.
We may ask how this change can be accomplished. What is the origin of spin?
Discrete properties can be represented by these scalar values as a finite set of information, and therefore all of nature can be represented by numbers. He asks “Could physics have a strong law of conservation of information?
Digital Philosophy | A New Way of Thinking About Physics
In Fredkin’s concept of a completely closed universe, there does not appear to be any difference in principle between observation of a collection of billions of cells i.
Navigation menu Personal tools Log in.
On the one hand, such an experimental proof would be problematical because no matter how closely we look, we can always imagine that if we looked even more closely the continuity would resolve into a finely-grained discreteness; therefore, the appearance of continuity in nature, as in the motion picture theater, can never itself be proof of actual continuity.
Views Read Edit View history. Fredkin supposes that investigation will show that there is no infinite and no infinitesimal; all things in nature and physics are finite. Brian Greene blah blah says wow this is going to be hard to find https: Quotes [ edit ] Cellular automata are now being used to model varied physical phenomena normally modelled by wave equations, fluid dynamics, Ising models, etc. Navigation Main page Recent changes Random page Help.
Edward Fredkin – Wikipedia
Under the roof of one controversial assumption about physics, fredkn discuss five big questions that can be addressed using concepts from a modern understanding of digital informational processes. Time slows down a in a gravitational field because the computational load is increased. Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Computing frontiers, Retrieved 11 March An informational process based on reversible universal cellular automata E Fredkin Physica D: Ed Fredkin Ed Fredkin — has had a distinguished career both in the commercial sector as well as academia.
This page was last edited on 11 Octoberat If this is the case, then all natural phenomena can be represented by scalar values — numbers. The possibility that DP may apply to various fields of science motivates this study.
The assumption is called finite nature.